assult this is detaild information on what i remember and what i think happend. what realy happend has no relation to what i think happend affter i was attacked but seems to fit in what i think. behind the bushes where i was assulted in front of the restaurant between that and the building next to it there is a space between them where one can walk to the back of the restaurant and the building next to it. at the rear theres a way to pass the fence and go into the parking area behind the restaurant. a guy that works or was at the restaurant after calling the cops for me kept pointing to the rear of the restaurant where the parking area is. and pointing across the street to wallfreens parking or the post road i dont know. first it was somone that knew he can go through the fence into the parking area behind the restaurant. befor crossing the street. any other way i would not niss seeing anyone. the guy that kept trying to tell me somthing where he was pointing must have seen somthing. so what i have now is direction of escape and a possable eye witness









epistle
anyhow
I count the years from the creation of the world to the birth of Noah as 1,506, and from the birth of Noah to the completion of the Ark, at the time of the universal deluge, as 600 (let the years be solar, or lunar, or a mixture of the ten) I hold that the Sacred Scriptures use solar years. And at the end of these 600 years, Noah entered the Ark to be saved from the deluge. This deluge was universal, and lasted one year and two months. And 295 years elapsed from the end of the flood to the birth of Abraham, and 100 from then till the birth of Isaac. And 60 years later Jacob was born. 130 years elapsed between the time he entered Egypt and the time he came out. Between the entry of Jacob into Egypt and the exodus, 430 years passed. From the exodus to the building of the Temple by Solomon in the fourth year of his reign, 480 years. According to the calculations of the Sacred Writings, it was 490 years from the building of the Temple to the time of Jesus Christ. Thus, this calculation of mine, collected from the holy writ, comes to about 4173 years and 8 months, more or less. Because there is such a diversity of sects, I will not go beyond Jesus Christ.

the true roman catholic bible describes the beast as 666. where the king james version describes the beast as 666 and three score 6 two difrent ways from two bibles. and makes my thinking as 666 times 3. which comes to the year 1998. and in 1998 bin laden makes a threat to the usa. and other history i dont yet know of . then in 2001 came 9/11.. nostrodamus in his epistle shows that from creation to just befor christ is 4173 years. and from christ to 2016 add 4173 is 6189 years. showing earth is 6000 years from creation. nostrodamus counted the years just befor christ as 4173 years.. after christ to now 2016 years and the counted years from creation add up to 6189 years from creation... we are 189 years in the 7th melinium..







oath
th
THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM
Given by His Holiness St. Pius X September 1, 1910.
To be sworn to by all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors, and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries.

I . . . . firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day. And first of all, I profess that God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (see Rom. 1:19), that is, from the visible works of creation, as a cause from its effects, and that, therefore, his existence can also be demonstrated: Secondly, I accept and acknowledge the external proofs of revelation, that is, divine acts and especially miracles and prophecies as the surest signs of the divine origin of the Christian religion and I hold that these same proofs are well adapted to the understanding of all eras and all men, even of this time. Thirdly, I believe with equally firm faith that the Church, the guardian and teacher of the revealed word, was personally instituted by the real and historical Christ when he lived among us, and that the Church was built upon Peter, the prince of the apostolic hierarchy, and his successors for the duration of time. Fourthly, I sincerely hold that the doctrine of faith was handed down to us from the apostles through the orthodox Fathers in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport. Therefore, I entirely reject the heretical' misrepresentation that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously. I also condemn every error according to which, in place of the divine deposit which has been given to the spouse of Christ to be carefully guarded by her, there is put a philosophical figment or product of a human conscience that has gradually been developed by human effort and will continue to develop indefinitely. Fifthly, I hold with certainty and sincerely confess that faith is not a blind sentiment of religion welling up from the depths of the subconscious under the impulse of the heart and the motion of a will trained to morality; but faith is a genuine assent of the intellect to truth received by hearing from an external source. By this assent, because of the authority of the supremely truthful God, we believe to be true that which has been revealed and attested to by a personal God, our creator and lord.

Furthermore, with due reverence, I submit and adhere with my whole heart to the condemnations, declarations, and all the prescripts contained in the encyclical Pascendi and in the decree Lamentabili, especially those concerning what is known as the history of dogmas. I also reject the error of those who say that the faith held by the Church can contradict history, and that Catholic dogmas, in the sense in which they are now understood, are irreconcilable with a more realistic view of the origins of the Christian religion. I also condemn and reject the opinion of those who say that a well-educated Christian assumes a dual personality-that of a believer and at the same time of a historian, as if it were permissible for a historian to hold things that contradict the faith of the believer, or to establish premises which, provided there be no direct denial of dogmas, would lead to the conclusion that dogmas are either false or doubtful. Likewise, I reject that method of judging and interpreting Sacred Scripture which, departing from the tradition of the Church, the analogy of faith, and the norms of the Apostolic See, embraces the misrepresentations of the rationalists and with no prudence or restraint adopts textual criticism as the one and supreme norm. Furthermore, I reject the opinion of those who hold that a professor lecturing or writing on a historico-theological subject should first put aside any preconceived opinion about the supernatural origin of Catholic tradition or about the divine promise of help to preserve all revealed truth forever; and that they should then interpret the writings of each of the Fathers solely by scientific principles, excluding all sacred authority, and with the same liberty of judgment that is common in the investigation of all ordinary historical documents.

Finally, I declare that I am completely opposed to the error of the modernists who hold that there is nothing divine in sacred tradition; or what is far worse, say that there is, but in a pantheistic sense, with the result that there would remain nothing but this plain simple fact-one to be put on a par with the ordinary facts of history-the fact, namely, that a group of men by their own labor, skill, and talent have continued through subsequent ages a school begun by Christ and his apostles. I firmly hold, then, and shall hold to my dying breath the belief of the Fathers in the charism of truth, which certainly is, was, and always will be in the succession of the episcopacy from the apostles. The purpose of this is, then, not that dogma may be tailored according to what seems better and more suited to the culture of each age; rather, that the absolute and immutable truth preached by the apostles from the beginning may never be believed to be different, may never be understood in any other way.

I promise that I shall keep all these articles faithfully, entirely, and sincerely, and guard them inviolate, in no way deviating from them in teaching or in any way in word or in writing. Thus I promise, this I swear, so help me God. . .
e oath will go here
















them
Mind control (also known as brainwashing, reeducation, brainsweeping, coercive persuasion, thought control, or thought reform) is a controversial scientific theory that human subjects can be indoctrinated in a way that causes "an impairment of autonomy, an inability to think independently, and a disruption of beliefs and affiliations. In this context, brainwashing refers to the involuntary reeducation of basic beliefs and values".[1] Theories of brainwashing and of mind control were originally developed during the Korean War to explain how totalitarian regimes appeared to systematically indoctrinate prisoners of war through propaganda and torture techniques. These theories were later expanded and modified by psychologists including Margaret Singer and Philip Zimbardo to explain conversions to some new religious movements (NRMs). This resulted in scientific and legal debate;[2] with Eileen Barker, James Richardson, and other scholars, as well as legal experts, rejecting at least the popular understanding of the concept.[3] Other theories have been proposed by scholars including: Robert Cialdini, Stanley A. Deetz, Robert Jay Lifton, Michael J. Freeman, Daniel Romanovsky, Kathleen Taylor, and Benjamin Zablocki. The concept of mind control is sometimes involved in legal cases, especially regarding child custody; and is also a major theme in both science fiction and in criticism of modern political and corporate culture. However, in the view of most scholars, the theory of mind control is not accepted as scientific fact.[














creed
i believe in god the father allmighty creater of heaven and earth. and  in jesus christ
his only begoten son. our lord who was born of the virgin mary sufferd under pontis pilot
was crucified and burried. the third day he rose from the dead where he is at the right
hand of god the father allmighty from thence he will come to judge the living and the dead.
i believe in the holy ghost the holy catholic church
the communeion of saints the forgivness of sins and life everlasting













call
1.19.17
mom got a phone call from some guy telling that he is puting somthing in in the mail for her
about your warenty expired. then hung up. no info at all in optimums call hostory..
. thiat he is mailing it. this s stinks why dident whoever just mail it its not normal to call
and tell mom that he did .. i think it was somone that knows i will know about this
and will be watching the mail. anyone reading this has to know this isent right..it stinks.



















car
we keep geting a call warning us for the past two years now that our car warentee
expired. so somthing is for sure wrong with this. maybe to find out is anyone is home
at the address they pick. for what ever reason. but this is what i think. to find out if
anyone is home. and we dont have a car for 15 years now. i think this is a for sure thing
about checking if a address is no one home. ill go back and see ii can ge the number
that calld if i do ill put it in this report......call info below this line

01/25/2017 09:59 AM  Inbound  (720) 735-3159   Keenesburg, CO










yates
Trump fires acting Attorney General for refusing to defend immigration order
WASHINGTON --
In an extraordinary public showdown, President Donald Trump fired the acting attorney general of the United States after she publicly questioned the constitutionality of his refugee and immigration ban and refused to defend it in court.

The clash Monday night between Trump and Sally Yates, a career prosecutor and Democratic appointee, laid bare the growing discord and dissent surrounding an executive order that halted the entire U.S. refugee program and banned all entries from seven Muslim-majority nations for 90 days. The firing, in a written statement released just hours after Yates went public with her concerns, also served as a warning to other administration officials that Trump is prepared to terminate those who refuse to carry out his orders
Yates' refusal to defend the executive order was largely symbolic given that Sen. Jeff Sessions, Trump's pick for attorney general, will almost certainly defend the policy once he's sworn in. He's expected to be confirmed Tuesday by the Senate Judiciary Committee and could be approved within days by the full Senate.

Yet the firing reflected the mounting conflict over the executive order, as administration officials have moved to distance themselves from the policy and even some of Trump's top advisers have made clear that they were not consulted on its implementation.















doctor
STAMFORD - Connecticut's attorney general has sued a Stamford doctor and her husband.
The lawsuit says a couple allegedly took part in a scam to sell state employees medically unnecessary custom-made prescription drug creams.
According to the lawsuit, UConn employee Kwasi Gyambibi, of Stamford, and his wife, Dr. Kakra Gyambibi, convinced other state employees to use expensive drugs made by Advantage Medical and Pharmaceuticals.















vet
somthing not right
she took maggie to the vet a half hour drive with rush hour traffick one way
while i went to the bank a 15 m inut ridr one way
and 10 minute in the bank  is 25 minute one way.  then 15 minuts back home
comes to two way trip to 35 minuts. yet my cat was home from the vet when i got back home.
with the medican for maggie with a recept from the vet..  i calld the vet and the lady
there told me she took maggie with her and was there but did not leave maggie there
and in her voice i can see that she was confused as to why maggie did not stay.
i am going to have to pay the vet a viset to find what is going on that lady i calld
at the vet did seem a little upset about not leaving maggie there in her voice.
and the travel time between the bank and the vet. there is somthing wrong here
nuthing to show on paper the bill the medican or the
service done to maggie. no results seen. the medican given for her
was to lower white blood cells. but at a cost of the cells not there
to fight infection. i still dont know if she got a Antibiotics shot or somthing
i intend to check on and update the results here.




cat
must find out if anyone ownes her. if not ill takes her in<br>
shes in danger romeuing with that sick asshole there.<br>
he should be made to see a head doctor.
there is a real sick guy that chases her in a way as to make her think
that i chased her and makes her afraid to come back.
i think this is happening early in the morning when its just light
she waite for my in my drivway early so she dont miss makeing me
know she is there. then that sick ass hole makes her afraid



girl
a very pretty cat came back home today. i was worried. you gotta see her.